Oil: Gasoline Gets Expensive Again

The financial collapse of September 2008 took the wind out of oil’s bullish run from $10 per barrel in the late 1990s to over $140 in mid-2008. But as the US economy regains its footing (even the housing sector by late 2011), gasoline is shooting back up toward $4 per gallon. Prices recently climbed back above $3 per gallon – meaning that Americans are again sending over $1 billion per day for overseas imports to serve our oil addiction.  It’s time for our country to embrace the bicycle and more walking – but I’ll leave more on that for another post. I see gasoline increasing toward $3.25+ on $100 oil due to an inability of non-OPEC producers to increase supply that matches higher demand, particularly from China. And most OPEC nations seem reluctant to increase output levels while prices rise.

Coal: Historic Highs on Their Way

China and India are becoming huge net importers of coal and this development will tighten the global coal market significantly. South African, Indonesian, and Australian exports will be maxed out, sending importers on the lookout for coal from the US and elsewhere. Supply increases take time so the tight global market will likely push spot market coal prices above $150/ton, potentially challenging mid-2008 levels above $175/ton.

Natural Gas: Rising from the Bottom

Natural gas prices in the US have remained relatively low even during the recent 18-month run-up in oil prices, a departure from the usual price link between oil and natural gas. This divergence in price is due to recent growth in natural gas supply based on new drilling techniques that use potent chemical mixes to extract shale gas formerly too difficult to retrieve. Unless the extraction techniques are slowed on water pollution concerns, this drilling is poised to keep a lid on natural gas prices and thus help natural gas keep market share it took from coal in 2009. I see natural gas rising from the bottom ~$4 per MMBtu lately but staying mostly restrained below $7 (still significantly below the summer 2008 high ~$10).

Solar: The Boom Continues

2010 is turning into another record year for solar. Globally, solar installations grew more than 100% to ~16 GW. This occurred in a year many analysts were fretting for solar due to accelerated cuts in German subsidies. But Germany still grew tremendously thanks to lower solar costs and the country remains almost half of the global market. German officials are considering more accelerated subsidy cuts in 2011 to slow their overheated market greater than 7 GW this year, causing some analysts to worry again. But I see next year playing out in a similar way to 2010, with another record year ahead as the global solar market passes 20 GW.

I expect German subsidy reductions will help solar consumers everywhere enjoy 10-15% price reductions for solar PV panels, bringing them below $1.50 per Watt. The strong recent profits of many solar producers such as First Solar, Trina, Suntech, Yingli Green Energy, JA Solar, and Jinko show that most producers can handle a price drop of this magnitude. Such a low price for modules and panels would send solar electricity prices below 30 cents per kWh for residential, below 20 cents per kWh for commercial, and ~15 cents per kWh for industrial. This is a price that can now compete without subsidies in islands and remote applications that don’t yet have access to a grid (a market that includes over a billion people). And sufficient subsidies in growing solar markets such as the US, China, India and Italy are poised to take up the slack from German demand stagnation until larger grid parity is achieved in 2012-15.

Wind

After record growth in 2009, 2010 has been a tough year for the wind industry. Low natural gas prices and the lack of new projects signed during the Great Recession has dramatically slowed wind power installation in the US and most of the world. Though China wind growth continues unabated due to its white-hot electricity demand growth and may have just passed the US as the global leader of wind power capacity. But the stagnant overall market this past year means that wind turbine prices are lower and getting more competitive with fossil fuel-fired electricity. Look for wind turbine prices below $1.45 per Watt and total cost including installation below $2 per Watt onshore. The offshore market has higher installation costs that are offset by more consistent winds and close proximity to demand centers (cities). Offshore wind can begin to take growing market share in 2011.

Efficient Renewables Closing the Gap with Fossil Fuels

As described above, I see solar and wind power prices further converging with fossil fuel prices in 2011. Therefore renewable subsidies can be lowered in cash-strapped countries without risking market collapse. Increasingly efficient lighting (such as CFLs and LEDs) and other appliances will open up solar and wind resources to the masses, especially when complemented by efficient active transport by bicycle along growing greenways and bike lanes. The key potential game changer for oil and other commodity prices would be a significant weakening or strengthening of the dollar, either stoking higher prices in the US or taming the increase, respectively.

The energy system is in for big change during 2011. Investment in efficiency and renewables will pay off for early adopters as cleantech moves from niche market to more mainstream source.

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-

Dennis Markatos-Soriano

Europe Continues to Dominate Current Solar Market

Germany was able to pick up the slack from Spain and grow to ~50% of the global total. Italy, the Czech Republic, and elsewhere in Europe made up another 24% of the global market.

But Europe’s 74% global share was down from over 80% in 2008. The US remained the third largest solar market (this year after Germany and Italy) at 8% of the global market. Solar installations grew a quick 36% in the US to 485 MW in 2009. Japan ranked fourth after its market more than doubled.

Solar cell production is now close to 10 GW (less than a third of wind turbine production in 2009, but its catching up). Global solar demand may approach the 10 GW milestone in 2010 as it is expected to return to white-hot growth. This growth is less dependent on subsidies since the price of solar modules fell 38% during 2009 and prices are expected to continue to decrease in 2010. This could usher in the period of affordable solar by late 2010, especially if prices for oil, natural gas, and coal continue to trend higher.

While solar won’t be as cheap an emissions reduction option as the bicycle, its ability to compete economically with fossil fuels will be greatly enhanced in the year ahead.

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-

Dennis Markatos-Soriano

Wind Tech Advances Quicker Than Fossil Energy Tech

Many fossil energy advocates who ignore the harmful global warming effects of burning oil and natural gas pretend like technological change will allow us to increase our use of these fuels forever. But the reality is that US oil reserves and production have fallen more than 15% and 20%, respectively, since the early 1990s. And at some point within the next decade or so a similar trend will likely constrain the natural gas market even though EIA estimates of its reserves have climbed ~50% since 1993. Over the same time period, the estimate of wind power potential has climbed more than 3.5 times what the Pacific Northwest Laboratory estimated in 1993. This shows that wind technology during the period has advanced much quicker than exploration and production technology for oil and natural gas. A major improvement comes from taller wind turbines today, since wind is stronger at 80 meters than at 50 meters above the ground.

The Biggest Changes

The main sources of growth for US wind power potential came in the Great Plains, which was already known to be the heart of our resource. Texas, long the largest wind power producing state, is now estimated to be the top state for wind potential after passing the Dakotas and Kansas. In fact, it is estimated that Texas can produce from wind 15X the amount of power it consumes from all electric sources today. Another twenty states can also produce so much wind power that they could become major exporters of this electricity to other states around the country. The estimate excluded wind potential in parks, urban areas and over water — so this is a major underestimate once you consider the offshore wind potential we have off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. Even so, the 37,000 TWh per year (~365 quadrillion Btus) listed in their onshore wind power estimate is more energy than that contained in our oil and natural gas reserves combined.

Solar Energy Potential Even Larger

The estimate of solar energy potential is more than 100X that of wind power, at over 2,000 TW. So, the issue for renewable energy isn’t any lack of supply. The challenge is for us is to continue cost reductions for wind and solar to make them cheaper than their fossil energy competitors. The year 2010 could be a breakthrough period in that regard as prices for wind turbines and solar modules fall toward grid parity.

Renewables Dominance Will Take Over a Decade

Even when wind and solar are more economical, it will take some time for them to grow from their current base of ~2% of US electricity. Manufacturers of solar modules and wind turbines will have to ramp up global production capacity from current levels of ~10 GW and ~40 GW, respectively, to at least 50 GW each before these sources of electricity can take significant market share from natural gas, oil, and coal. And we will need to continue to improve energy storage capabilities and economics along with our development of a smart grid that can adjust to the intermittency of wind and sunshine for this transition to renewables to take place smoothly over the next 10-25 years.

Now we know there is plenty of renewable energy available to keep us warm, lighted, and wired throughout the 21st century once we have moved on from our dependence on fossil fuels. Let’s make 2010 a huge step in this monumental project!

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-

Dennis Markatos-Soriano

Price per Watt Dips Quickly

The price of a single solar module in Europe fell 2.2% (10 euro cents) to 4.34 euros per Watt. The August price was almost 8% below that of August 2008 and represents a new record low. And remember, this price survey is for single modules, so large orders would get lower prices.

In the US, prices fell 2.4% (11 cents) to $4.45 per Watt. The August price is now less than 3% above the record low set a few years ago. The price of solar electricity fell almost 2% to reach a new record low in all three categories:

Residential fell below 36 cents per kWh for the first time at 35.89 cents, commercial fell below 26 cents for the first time at 25.77 cents, and industrial slid to 20.07 cents per kWh.

The eight-year survey witnessed two new monthly records: number of lower prices for modules and the rate of decline (described above). A total of 176 modules had lower prices (12.7% of the survey) compared to the previous record of 126 (9.2%) in May of this year. The previous record change was an increase in prices at 142 modules in August 2005.

And Demand Poised to Grow

Solarbuzz also reported that more solar projects are moving again, a sign that demand should pick up quickly in the months ahead. Economic recovery, green governmental policy, and more attractive prices are the main drivers of this increase in demand.

Bottom line: While solar electricity prices remain higher than most conventional electricity markets, they are getting more and more competitive as the months roll by. September should be an exciting month as prices continue to decline and finally reach a record low in the US. Combining further solar price reductions with a return of tight oil market this winter should help the price of solar reach its most attractive point ever relative to other energy sources.

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-

US Oil Output 1% Below Last Year

The US EIA weekly petroleum report announced that US oil output fell 1.3% last week to a rate of 5.107 million barrels per day (Mbd). That is 1% below the same week in 2008 and 6.8% lower than the 2009 production peak of 5.48 Mbd hit in mid-April.

How Low Could Oil Output Fall?

US oil output will probably continue to gradually fall since drilling for new wells remains below average on the relatively lower oil prices of 2009. But production will be higher than last year in the period from late August to October — unless we have an unlikely repeat of hurricanes slamming directly into the Gulf of Mexico’s oil production and refining hub. But an interesting question is, “How low could US oil output go?” If the average output decline of .5% per week over the last 15 weeks continued for several weeks, production would be significantly below 5 Mbd by the winter. Such an occurrence could lift prices back to $80 per barrel, especially if current trends continue to our South.

Mexico Oil Output Plummets Further

Mexico’s state-run oil company, PeMex, recently reported its output fell even more in June. Its liquid production was 3.6% below May levels, and 10% below June 2008 (crude was 11% lower). Production is now at the lowest point since the early 1990s and shows little sign of curbing its fall. Output from Mexico’s largest discovered field, Cantarell, continued to nosedive — falling 41% from last June to a production of .604 Mbd. This country that was recently the second largest source of US imports may struggle to export a single barrel by 2015.

With lower output in the US and Mexico (along with depletion in Norway, the UK and Russia), the only way we can keep a lid on our transportation costs in the years ahead is to increase fuel efficiency and implement an active transportation revolution. A bicycle network for local and long-distance travel will be an important step for US planners to take (see the East Coast Greenway vision for a model). And as Fatih Birol of the International Energy Agency says, let’s leave oil before oil leaves us.

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-

The Details

After 2008 witnessed a US emissions fall of almost 3% (due mostly to oil demand decreasing in response to higher prices), all fossil fuels are contributing to this year’s emissions drop. Coal has the biggest drop, now estimated to be ~6.9% due to lower industrial demand and low-priced natural gas replacing some coal in the electricity sector. Oil demand is revised downward from June to a fall of 3.3% for the year. And natural gas was revised downward to a consumption level 2.3% below 2008. All of these drops translate into energy-related emissions that are 4.3% below last year.

1990 Levels Not Far Away

Such a drop would make 2009 emissions just ~6.5% above 1990 levels and already 7.5% below 2005 levels. It would make 1990 emissions levels within reach by 2015 and the Waxman-Markey goal of 17% below 2005 achievable by 2017 (rather than 2020) by just reducing emissions 1% per year going forward.

Room for Further Reductions in 2009

And I believe the EIA may still underestimate 2009 reduction in fossil fuel energy demand. Its prediction that oil demand will fall 3.3% is slower than the current consumption decrease rate above 5%. And coal demand is also falling faster than 8% so far this year (rather than the ~6.9% EIA predicts). Continuing current demand trends could send emissions down more than 5% in 2009.

Looking Ahead

The EIA predicts some rebound in energy demand in 2010, but only a fraction of this year’s drop. In fact, the .8% expected recovery in electricity demand in 2010 could be provided in full by wind, solar, and geothermal rather than switching the fossil fuel plants back on.

Bottom line: US greenhouse gas emissions are falling quickly in 2009 and bringing us within close reach (a few years) of 1990 levels. This fact means that the Senate can comfortably promote Waxman-Markey’s goal of 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 or even strengthen it back to 20% below 2005 levels by 2020. We need their leadership to get climate legislation to the President’s desk. Renewable energy and efficiency are ready to simultaneously drive economic growth, create jobs, and lower our nation’s emissions. I will keep you updated on progress as it happens.

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-

Competing with Thin Film’s First Solar

The cost leader for solar has recently been First Solar, who lowered their production cost per watt to 93 cents during the first quarter. But the lower efficiency of First Solar’s modules (at ~10.9% vs. 14-22% for silicon-based cells) means that selling its modules at $1 per watt is equivalent to Yingli Green Energy, JA Solar or Sunpower selling its modules for $1.30-$2 per watt. I thought sub-$1.75 per watt was unrealistic for crystalline silicon producers in 2009. But LDK’s revised second quarter guidance means that such prices are expected per silicon-based watt throughout the rest of the year.

Prices Less than Half 2nd Quarter 2008

Such a price translates into less than half the price of just a year ago. If installation costs can fall in a similar trajectory, relative prices versus fossil fuels will be similar to last year at this time. And once economic recovery begins to lift the price of natural gas in coming months, solar will become competitive and demand will soar.

The Strong Will Thrive

Solar companies who are strong enough to weather the next few months by lowering their cost of production will emerge highly profitable as the recession subsides. In the meantime, the second half of 2009 may witness serious consolidation throughout the solar industry as impaired financial markets fail to provide enough capital for smaller players. But the stronger producers (such as First Solar, Sunpower, and Suntech) appear poised to thrive as solar becomes mainstream and grid parity expands into several markets by 2010.

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-

Thousands of Deaths per Year

The same combustibility that makes fossil fuels a generous energy source claims the lives of thousands of people per year worldwide. A natural gas plant in Saudi Arabia recently exploded and killed 40 people. Several helicopters ferrying offshore oil workers have crashed in the last few months in the UK, the US, and Canada, killing scores of workers. But the most deaths probably occur in the coal mines of China, where thousands of miners lose their lives each year in explosions, collapses, and floods.

Renewable Energy Not Immune to Accidents

Wind turbines hundreds of feet in the air and rooftop solar installations can sometimes result in injuries or even a fatality as well. So the industry will need to take care and government regulations will be crucial to keep those numbers low as these industries scale up. Another risk that wind companies must take responsibility for is potential accidents at iron ore mines that are the source of their turbines’ steel (a recent iron ore flooding accident in China claimed 29 lives).

Bottom Line: The transition to efficiency and renewable energy reliance can help reduce mortality in our global energy system – not just from the effects of climate change and pollution. But even though wind and solar power may have inherently fewer risks, safety regulations will need to adapt to keep up with these new technologies and ensure the safety of the growing green-collar workforce.

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-

Coal Use Projected to Fall ~5%

Building on the lower coal consumption trend of the first quarter, the EIA estimates coal demand to be ~5% lower in 2009. With oil and natural gas demand down ~3% and 2.2% (respectively), energy-related US carbon dioxide emissions are projected to fall ~3.5%.

Still room for lower emissions

I still see room for even these projections to be overestimates. Coal consumption could remain almost 10% below 2008 levels due to the huge supply of natural gas and the cutbacks in industrial production from the likes of GM and Chrysler. And oil demand projections are based on a significant increase from the first five months. I see more likelihood that oil demand remains low to leave 2009 consumption at 5% or more below last year.

Such consumption would send overall carbon emissions down more than 5% in 2009 and to less than 5% above 1990 levels. Since the Waxman-Markey ACESA sets targets based on 2005 emission levels, I will also express these emissions relative to 2005. By my estimates, 2009 emissions falling 5% would lower them to more than 8% below 2005 levels. It makes the Waxman-Markey goal of 17% below 2005 achievable by reducing emissions only .8% per year.

Bottom Line: US emissions are poised to fall dramatically in 2009, putting us in a good position to lower emissions significantly below 1990 levels in the 2010s. Based on the prospect of strong growth for wind, solar, and efficiency in the years ahead, emissions levels of 20-25% below 2005 in 2020 (~8-14% below 1990 levels) are achievable by lowering emissions at a reasonable rate of ~1.5% per year.

Let’s make it happen!

ACES Act caps US greenhouse gas emissions

The passed bill would establish a cap-and-trade system to achieve lower US emissions levels by allowing institutions to trade their emissions permits so that the most efficient reduction projects are executed. This market-based incentive is estimated to be cheaper than mandating all institutions to lower emissions the chosen percentage without regard to each institution’s costs. The cap, beginning in 2012, is set for 2020 emissions to equal 17% below 2005 (or ~4% below 1990) and then 2050 emissions at 83% below 2005 (~80% below 1990). The original bill draft called for 20% below 2005 by 2020 but was relaxed as a compromise to shore up support among legislators from coal states.

The sharp drop in emissions during 2008-09 already has emissions at 6% below 2005 levels, so 17% below seems unaggressive to me. I hope advances in solar, wind, and efficiency help persuade legislators to lower the cap at least back to 20% below 2005 during the bill’s continued development or after it becomes law.

Electricity Emissions Continuing to Plunge

The EIA just published its preliminary estimate for March electricity generation, and the numbers are even more climate-friendly than last month. The most notable change is the large substitution from coal to natural gas due to the recent lower prices for natural gas. Coal use fell 14.5% from March 2008 while natural gas consumption increased 5%. More good news for the climate were a 1.2% increase in hydroelectric power generation, a .3% increase for nuclear, and a 4.8% decrease for petroleum liquids.

Year-to-date, 2009 coal consumption for electricity is down a whopping 10.2% (much more than the EIA projection of ~2.5%, as I wrote last week would probably occur). Natural gas use for electricity has fallen .8%. US emissions could fall as much as 5% in 2009 (to 7.5% below 2005 levels) if current trends continue. But for now, I’ll stick with the more conservative projection that they will fall more than 3%.

Here’s to swift passage of climate legislation to ensure emissions continue falling during our economic recovery in the 2010s.

Onwards in the Sustainable Energy Transition-