<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SET Energy &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://setenergy.org/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://setenergy.org</link>
	<description>Sustainable Energy Transition</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Recap: Is the optimal goal 350 ppm or 550 ppm?</title>
		<link>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/24/daily-recap-is-the-optimal-goal-350-ppm-or-550-ppm/</link>
		<comments>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/24/daily-recap-is-the-optimal-goal-350-ppm-or-550-ppm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://setenergy.org/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past semester, I studied the price of oil and its relationship to the cost of climate mitigation. It culminated in a paper for Professor Michael Oppenheimer that showed sustained record prices for oil will help make deep emission cuts much cheaper than before. The current price acts not only as a large tax on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past semester, I studied the price of oil and its relationship to the cost of climate mitigation. It culminated in a paper for <a href="http://stepprog.princeton.edu/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=88&#038;Itemid=74">Professor Michael Oppenheimer</a> that showed sustained record prices for oil will help make deep emission cuts much cheaper than before. The current price acts not only as a large tax on oil, to the tune of $200 per ton of carbon dioxide, but also pulls the price of other fossil energy sources up as well (as we have been reporting for natural gas and coal). Such a price level was unfathomable in previous mitigation cost models such as the Stern Review estimate of a high oil price being $80 per barrel (70% below today). If oil prices rise to $250 per barrel next year as Gazprom projected that would be equivalent to an almost $500 per ton of carbon dioxide without policymakers having to intervene. The current higher prices, as modeled in the Stern Review, would move optimal concentration of greenhouse gases down a great deal from the 550 parts per million (ppm) level originally estimated by the 2006 study.  <span id="more-21"></span></p>
<p>Current prices seem to make even the <a href="http://www.350.org">recent calls by climate activists Bill McKibben and James Hansen for 350 ppm</a>, a reduction from today&#8217;s 385 ppm, a possibility as long as we can figure out carbon capture and sequestration for new coal plants.  They point to the scary fact that the last time concentrations were in the 550 range, sea level was several meters higher than today. So here&#8217;s to some swift innovations in efficiency, wind and solar along with policy that maximizes current technologies available to get developed world emissions falling quickly and developing world emissions cresting soon. Germany is a top model for the sustainable energy transition necessary which I will explore in a future post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/24/daily-recap-is-the-optimal-goal-350-ppm-or-550-ppm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Recap: China raises price of oil and other news</title>
		<link>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/19/daily-recap-china-raises-price-of-oil-and-other-news/</link>
		<comments>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/19/daily-recap-china-raises-price-of-oil-and-other-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://setenergy.org/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the biggest source of growth in global oil demand cut subsidies that were exaggerating its appetite for the fuel. China, beginning Friday, is increasing the price of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel by 17%, 18%, and 25%, respectfully. Their price is still below the global market equilibrium, but the increase should help to keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the biggest source of growth in global oil demand cut subsidies that were exaggerating its appetite for the fuel. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&#038;sid=a3NMcrcSDpD8&#038;refer=asia ">China, beginning Friday, is increasing the price of gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel</a> by 17%, 18%, and 25%, respectfully. Their price is still below the global market equilibrium, but the increase should help to keep demand from growing as swiftly as their economy (which grew 10.6% in the first quarter of 2008). This should help the demand side of the equation a bit and helped oil prices slide a few dollars today. But the risk of continued increases in the price of oil and gasoline remains as supply struggles to suffice the demand of a growing world population and economy. In fact, large banks such as <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/7596372">Credit Suisse and Barclays Capital predict non-OPEC oil production will plateau</a> and even fall slightly in the coming years bringing $150+ oil prices.</p>
<p>In natural gas news,<span id="more-16"></span> <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/natural_gas/ngs/ngs.html">the EIA reported a weak build</a> for US storage this past week to 1,943 billion cubic feet, which is 16.2% below last year&#8217;s high level and 2.6% below the 5-year average. But prices still fell slightly on the ease in global oil prices. </p>
<p>Its nice that consumers can get at least a day off from record prices, but such days should not mean that we slow our efforts to transition to an efficient sustainable energy future. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/19/daily-recap-china-raises-price-of-oil-and-other-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Recap: Natural Gas Prices Sky High Too</title>
		<link>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/16/daily-recap-natural-gas-prices-sky-high-too/</link>
		<comments>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/16/daily-recap-natural-gas-prices-sky-high-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://setenergy.org/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As discussed before, all fossil fuels are at historic highs currently. Natural gas is the only major fuel that is not at an all-time high in the US &#8212; but that record could be broken this winter, if not before. The key reasons emerge from both supply and demand. On the demand side, our consumption [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As discussed before, all fossil fuels are at historic highs currently. Natural gas is the only major fuel that  is not at an all-time high in the US &#8212; but that record could be broken this winter, if not before. The key reasons emerge from both supply and demand.</p>
<p>On the demand side, our consumption is rising swiftly. After a 6.5% leap in consumption in 2007 (almost half of global demand growth), the <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/steo/pub/contents.html?featureclicked=4&#038;">EIA predicts another 2.2%</a> of demand growth in 2008.</p>
<p>On the supply side, <span id="more-13"></span>there is a decline in production in our top source of imports, Canada. The decline was <a href="http://www.bp.com/productlanding.do?categoryId=6929&#038;contentId=7044622">2.5% in 2007</a>. Also, the global market for Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) is tighter than last year. We are receiving less than half the LNG imports of last year due to the higher price paid by consumers in the UK and elsewhere. The supply side savior is the increased domestic production which rose 4.3% in 2007 and is predicted to grow more than 5% in 2008.</p>
<p>All these factors together has resulted in a reduction in domestic storage of 15% from last year. There is little fear that we will run out of storage, as last year was a record storage year. But the tight market is a remedy for continued increases in prices.</p>
<p>Today, the price of natural gas <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20602099&#038;sid=aBIPsRWmVf.k&#038;refer=energy">hit $12.99 per million Btu</a> (MBtu), 73% higher than last year at this time. It is the highest since December 2005 after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita disrupted domestic natural gas production.The price crested on December 13th, 2005, at $15.78 (less than 25% higher than today&#8217;s price). So, a continued rise in the price of its chief competitor fuel, oil, along with a cold winter and potentially a hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico, could send natural gas to a record high within a few months. In fact, early 2009 future prices of natural gas in the UK are above $18 per MBtu, so if we need to attract LNG imports to our shores &#8211; we&#8217;ll have to reach some level of parity with that much higher price. </p>
<p>Such record high prices would mean much higher heating bills this winter and higher electricity bills this summer and moving forward. An <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2008-06-15-power-prices-rising_N.htm">article in today&#8217;s USA Today</a> discusses 29% price hikes for electricity across much of the US already. Natural gas is a key price setter for electricity as the top source of marginal electricity during peak loads. So, the message is clear: if we want to keep your electricity and heating bills on par with last year, we will need to focus on the efficiency of our appliances and, yes, wear a sweater. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/16/daily-recap-natural-gas-prices-sky-high-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Recap: New coal price records open gates for renewables</title>
		<link>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/15/daily-recap-new-coal-price-records-raise-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/15/daily-recap-new-coal-price-records-raise-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://setenergy.org/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coal has been hailed as an abundant, cheap source of energy for over a century. Compared to oil, it is abundant with its 3.3% production increase in 2007 versus oil&#8217;s decline. But even with the increase in supply, demand is currently growing faster and driving price increases that rival its fossil fuel cousins. Additionally, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal has been hailed as an abundant, cheap source of energy for over a century. Compared to oil, it is abundant with its 3.3% production increase in 2007 versus oil&#8217;s decline.  But even with the increase in supply, demand is currently growing faster and driving price increases that rival its fossil fuel cousins. Additionally, as I mentioned <a href="http://www.igloo.org/dmarkatos/bpstatisti">a few blogs back</a>, the annual <a href="http://www.bp.com/productlanding.do?categoryId=6929&#038;contentId=7044622">BP Statistical Review of World Energy</a> reported a huge drop in proven reserves of 7.3%. After printing a reserves total of 909 billion tonnes at the end of 2006, the number fell to 847 billion tons at the end of 2007. The largest downward revisions occurred in India, Poland, Indonesia, Brazil, the Czech Republic, Turkey, and Pakistan and are left unexplained as they surpass the amount produced. </p>
<p>The price of internationally traded coal has doubled over the last year,<span id="more-9"></span> as the price per tonne in Europe moves <a href="http://www.globalcoal.com">toward $200</a>. Now that several coal producers aim to replace some oil imports with coal-to-liquid fuels, demand could climb even faster. And if oil does move to ~$200 per barrel, further coal demand as a substitute could make prices like $300 thermal and $400 metallurgical per tonne a possibility in 2009. Such a price would make wind energy the least cost option for new electricity throughout much of the world. </p>
<p>The fact that relatively cheaper wind may happen, on top of the potential for additional costs for carbon dioxide output, should lead utilities in windy regions around the US to make much larger investments in wind farms. And with US coal reserves accounting for more than 28% of the global total, coal export growth could help us remedy our trade deficit if we can reduce our domestic consumption. It seems a win-win situation for us to follow the trail blazed by Germany of fossil fuel energy consumption reduction and renewables share increases.</p>
<p>Many of my friends have been worried that higher oil prices would lead to a rush for coal, but record high coal prices seem to show that sound policy can shift the rush to renewables and build a sustainable energy transition for the US and the rest of the world. Let&#8217;s make it happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://setenergy.org/2008/06/15/daily-recap-new-coal-price-records-raise-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

